Panel Saw Cut List Generator
Panel saws cut in straight lines from edge to edge of the current piece. That's the constraint. A "perfectly nested" layout from a generic optimizer might include cuts that start in the middle of a sheet — your panel saw operator can't physically execute that.
A panel saw cut list needs guillotine mode: every cut goes from one edge of the remaining piece to the opposite edge. EZNESTING does this natively, plus it orders the cuts in a sequence that makes sense to the operator.
Guillotine cuts vs free-arrangement cuts
Guillotine cutting: every cut starts at one edge and ends at the opposite edge of the current piece. Make a cut across a 4×8 sheet, you get two rectangles. Cut one of those rectangles in two, repeat. Every cut produces clean rectangular sub-pieces.
Free-arrangement (also called "best-fit" or "non-guillotine"): parts can be arranged anywhere on the sheet, with cuts that start in the middle of a piece. This gives the best material utilization mathematically — but it can only be cut on a CNC router or by hand with a track saw.
A vertical panel saw (Striebig, Safety Speed Cut, Holzher) can only cut guillotine. A horizontal sliding table saw can do limited non-guillotine cuts but it's awkward. Set EZNESTING's optimizer to guillotine mode for any panel saw workflow.
Worked example: 4×8 broken down for cabinet boxes
A single 4×8 sheet of 3/4" plywood, breaking down for two base cabinets:
- 4 sides @ 23" × 30"
- 2 bottoms @ 22.5" × 23"
- 2 backs @ 23" × 29.5"
In guillotine mode, EZNESTING outputs:
- First cut: 30" off the top of the sheet (yields a 96" × 30" strip plus a 96" × 18" strip)
- From the 30" strip: rip into 4 pieces × 23" wide (the cabinet sides)
- From the 18" strip: 2 pieces at 23" × 22.5" (the bottoms) + 2 pieces at 23" × 29.5" (the backs)
The operator sees a clear cut sequence with consistent fence settings. No mid-sheet cuts, no part rotation that breaks the guillotine constraint.
In free-arrangement mode on the same parts, the optimizer might fit everything into 0.9 sheets — but the layout would be unbuildable on a panel saw.
Cut sequence: first the longest cut
For a vertical panel saw, the longest cuts come first. Here's why: long cuts use the full crosscut capacity of the saw. Once you've broken the sheet into smaller pieces, those pieces fit comfortably on the saw for shorter cuts.
The reverse order (short cuts first) means you'd be cutting full sheets into small pieces, which still works but uses awkward saw positions and risks the small pieces falling off the table.
EZNESTING orders cuts left-to-right, top-to-bottom within each sheet, with longest cuts first. Hand the printout to your operator and they can work through it without re-thinking the strategy.
Why best-utilization isn't always best on a panel saw
A free-arrangement optimizer might give you 94% utilization. A guillotine optimizer on the same parts gives 88%. That 6% extra material sounds like waste.
It's not — it's the price of being able to cut the layout on the equipment you have. The "94% nest" can't be executed on a panel saw. You'd have to buy a CNC router (six-figure investment) to use that utilization.
For a small shop running a Striebig or similar, the trade is real: slightly higher material cost, much lower equipment cost. The CNC math only works at high cabinet volumes.
When to use a CNC router instead
Crossover point is roughly 15-30 cabinet boxes/week, depending on your panel saw operator's hourly cost and the value of better material utilization.
- < 15 boxes/week: panel saw is fine. Use guillotine optimization.
- 15-30 boxes/week: investment math gets murky. Depends on whether your operator is full-time on the saw or splitting time.
- > 30 boxes/week: CNC router pays back inside 18 months on material savings + operator productivity. Switch to the CNC router nest optimizer and free-arrangement mode.
Even shops with CNC routers often keep a panel saw for rough breakdown of full sheets — the guillotine cut list stays relevant.